Five live-dealer catalogues carry 1,574 of the 11,712 addresses
What an address index can and cannot show
Counting the 11,712 archived game addresses on the operator's domain by supplier, five live-dealer catalogues account for 1,574 of them — 13.4 per cent. The sportsbook accounts for none, because it does not live under the address pattern this count depends on.
A live-dealer table and a slot are different products bought from different companies, and a comparison site normally flattens both into one number labelled games. That number is unavailable here, because no lobby could be opened from where this site is written.
What is available is an index of 11,712 archived game addresses on the operator's domain, each ending in a title and a supplier name joined by an underscore. Sorting those addresses by supplier turns a marketing list into a distribution.
Five of the sixty-seven names in that distribution sell live-dealer product.
How much of the catalogue is dealt by a person?
Evolution Gaming appears on 779 distinct addresses, which makes it the largest single name in the whole index. Pragmatic Play Live follows on 600, then Bombay Live on 114, Live88 on 47 and Winfinity on 34.
Together those five carry 1,574 addresses, or 13.4 per cent of the 11,712 counted.
That is a larger share than the phrase “live casino tab” usually implies, and it is concentrated in an unusual way: two names hold 1,379 of those 1,574, and the remaining three hold 195 between them. A reader who dislikes one particular studio's tables is not choosing between five suppliers in practice. They are choosing between two.
The counts also settle a smaller question that comparison pages get wrong routinely. A supplier list is not a supplier ranking, and printing sixty-seven names in alphabetical order gives a studio carried by two addresses the same visual weight as one carried by 779. The method behind the count, its merges and the seven names it deliberately dropped are set out on the suppliers page.
What does an address actually prove about a table?
One sentence marks the edge of this evidence: a page naming that studio existed on the operator's domain on a dated capture.
It follows that the studio's product was on the site at that moment. It does not follow that any particular table is dealing today, and it supports no count of open seats, no table minimums and no maximums. Live-dealer catalogues in particular rotate, because the tables belong to the supplier's studio rather than to the casino, and a casino can drop or add a whole shelf without touching its own text.
Where a live session is available, a lobby filter is stronger evidence than an archive index. This is the weaker instrument used honestly, rather than the stronger one claimed dishonestly.
Why does the sportsbook show up in none of these numbers?
Because the count is built on the casino path, and a sportsbook does not live there. Zero of the 11,712 addresses is a betting market, and that zero is a property of the method rather than a finding about the operator.
The terms are the other place to look, and they say one thing about sport. Clause 4.1 requires the value of every deposit to be wagered at least once before a withdrawal is requested, and states in its own words that this applies to all deposits including sports bets, not merely those tied to promotions.
Sport appears in this contract as a way of satisfying a wagering condition.
What is absent is everything a person betting on sport would want: settlement rules, a void policy, a rule for an abandoned match, a maximum payout on a single ticket, a definition of when a market is settled and when a result becomes final. None of that was found in either archived bundle. Operators that run a serious sportsbook usually publish a separate betting-rules document running to tens of thousands of characters, and no such document surfaced in this reading.
That absence is recorded as an absence of reading rather than as proof that no such rules exist, on the terms set out in the reading rules.
What do the two fairness claims cover, and what do they leave out?
The operator makes two claims about fairness and they must not be merged.
For its own seven titles — dice, crash, roulette, plinko, mines, keno and hilo — it states that results are provably fair and can always be verified, and describes a chain of ten million SHA256 hashes generated per game.
For third-party titles it states something narrower: that by partnering with reputable game providers, it ensures those games adhere to high standards of fairness. Every live-dealer table on the site falls on that side of the line, as does every slot from the other sixty-six suppliers.
An assurance about who you buy from is not a mechanism a player can check.
Collapsing those two sentences into “all games are provably fair” produces a claim the operator has never made, and that collapse is routine in write-ups of this brand. Neither claim was verified here; both are recorded as the operator's own, dated to the August 2026 capture. The in-house range and the two bet limits that could be read are on the games page.
Which limits could not be read, and why that is the interesting half?
Two maximum bets appear in help-centre answers rather than in numbered clauses: slots at up to 1,000 dollars per spin, with “typically” the operator's own hedge, and blackjack at 100,000 dollars per hand.
Everything else stops at a template. The published answers for dice, crash, plinko, mines, keno and roulette carry placeholders instead of numbers, filled in when a logged-in account renders the page — the literal string reads “the maximum bet allowed in Dice game is {diceMaxBet}”.
No live-dealer table limit was found in either bundle at all. That is the figure a person choosing between a two-dollar table and a two-thousand-dollar one actually needs, and it exists only inside an account.
What connects the tables to the cashier?
Clause 4.1 again, and it is easy to miss because it sits in the deposit section rather than the games section.
Money paid in has to pass through a game once before it can be requested back. Whether that pass happens at a live table, on a slot or on a sports market is left to the player, but the pass itself is compulsory, and a request that arrives early may be delayed or denied until the deposit has been wagered in full.
The lobby is therefore a condition of the payout rather than a separate department, which is why the coins, the network rule and the four conditions on a withdrawal are read together on the payment methods page.