Ten alternatives publish a territory list, from one name to 74

What the ten lists agree on

Put the ten clauses in one column and 129 distinct places come out of them.

Not one of those 129 is named by all ten operators. Two get to nine: North Korea and the United States, and the single list missing both is the one-name clause at Bitcasino.io. Below those two the agreement falls away fast — Cuba, Curaçao, Iraq and Iran reach eight, Lithuania and Syria seven, and a band of nine more places including the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Israel and Ukraine reaches six.

Then the tail. Forty-six of the 129 places are named by exactly one operator in the ten.

That distribution is the finding. If these clauses were transcriptions of the same sanctions regime they would overlap almost completely, and they do not. Twenty-four of the 46 single-mention places come from CryptoLeo alone, among them Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Morocco, the Philippines, Türkiye and Uzbekistan. Wild.io alone accounts for Hong Kong, Indonesia, Kenya, Mauritius and Vietnam. A territorial clause is a commercial decision written by one company about its own market map, and the ten maps here were drawn separately.

Why the shortest list is the hardest cell to read

The obvious reading of a one against a 74 is that Bitcasino.io excludes almost nobody and CryptoLeo excludes almost everybody. Only half of that survives contact with the document.

The Bitcasino.io clause names Japan and stops. What follows it is a pointer: the restricted jurisdictions are described as a list held elsewhere and linked, and the linked schedule was not supplied in the text that was read. So the figure in the table is the number of places printed at the address that was opened. Every other name that clause may reach sits behind a reference this reading never resolved, and the cell says one because one is what was countable.

A long list and a short list are therefore not two points on one scale. They are two different acts of publishing, and only the long one can be checked line by line.

The same warning applies in reverse. CryptoLeo's 74 is a long, specific, checkable clause, and the length of it is evidence of disclosure rather than evidence of hostility. An operator that writes down 74 places has handed a reader 74 answers. An operator that writes down one and links the rest has handed over one.

Where Gamdom itself sits in that spread

Thirty-seven places, clause 3.4. That puts the brand this site is named after between Playbet.io and Bets.io, in the middle of a spread it did not set.

The interesting part of that clause is not its length but its motion. The passage captured on 9 August 2026 names 37; the equivalent passage in the copy captured on 24 April 2025 named 24. Thirteen names were added across those fifteen months and none was removed, which is a rate of change worth carrying into any comparison: the number in a cell describes a document on the day it was read, and this particular document grew by half in a little over a year.

Every one of the 37, plus the thirteen that arrived between the two copies and the one condition in the clause that carries no list at all, is set out on the clause quoted in full.

What a count in this column cannot settle

Three things, and each one gets confused with the count regularly.

It settles nothing about law. A company deciding not to trade somewhere and a legislature deciding what is permitted there are separate acts by separate parties, and this site reports only the first. Nothing on this page should be read as a statement about what any reader is permitted to do.

It settles nothing about the cashier. Payment providers carry territory rules of their own, applied at the moment money moves rather than at the moment an account opens, and those rules appear in no clause read for this table.

And it settles nothing about tomorrow. Gamdom's own clause grew by thirteen names in fifteen months without any announcement a reader would have seen. The other ten clauses are amendable on the same terms.

The rest of the comparison

A territorial count is one of five fields this site fills from documents. What each operator undertakes to pay out, and in what period, is the field with the widest spread of all, and it is set out row by row at ten rows and ten payout figures. Which of them attaches an amount to the moment documents are demanded, and which of them describes the power and withholds the trigger, is at documents listed, threshold withheld. Three of the ten lists above belong to operators compared against Gamdom clause by clause: Wild.io at 45, Instant Casino at 48, and CoinCasino at 36.

What stayed unread

Six of the ten clauses above were served live and four came from archived copies of the operator's own address. Vave's territorial position is unread entirely and stays blank. The Bitcasino.io schedule sits behind a pointer that was not followed.