Skip to content
Thirteen Added

Aneta Klimek, and the four things this site declines to do

The author, and the limits

Thirteen Added is named after a count: between two archived copies of one operator’s contract, fifteen months apart, thirteen territories joined the restricted list and zero left it. Aneta Klimek reads contracts as dated editions rather than as settled text.

Between an archived copy dated 24 April 2025 and one dated 9 August 2026, Gamdom's restricted-territory clause grew from 24 named places to 37 — thirteen added, none removed — and the law governing the contract moved from Curaçao to Costa Rica. Clause 4.1 of the current edition requires every deposit to be wagered at least once before any withdrawal, promotion or no promotion. The licence cells for Gamdom are empty because no permit number is published anywhere we could read: that is an absence of evidence, and it is printed as one rather than filled from a comparison site. An empty cell means the document was not read.
CasinoOperatorLicenceCountries barredWithdrawal limitVisit
Vavepaid placementTechOptions Group B.V.Curaçao no numberlist not readfrom 50,000 USDT in instalments cl. 8.8Visit
Gamdomnot publishednot published37not published
RocketpotDanneskjold Ventures B.V.Curacao34not published
Bitcasino.ioMoon Technologies B.V.Curaçao Gaming Authority1not published
Wild.ioStack Gaming Ltd.Curaçao Gaming Authority45not published
Wild FortuneMetlait SRLAnjouan Gaming Board47not published
Instant CasinoIgloo Ventures SRLCuraçao Gaming Authority48not published
CoinCasinoIgloo Ventures SRLAnjouan Gaming Board36not published
Bets.ioTechno Wave Systems S.R.L.Curaçao Gaming Authority42not published
Playbet.ioBitx Operations N.V.Curaçao Gaming Authority30not published
CryptoLeoUno Digital Media B.V.Curaçao Gaming Authority74not published
BetPlaysnot publishednot published15not published

Aneta Klimek, contract editions editor

Aneta Klimek writes this site and fills the 12 rows of its comparison table. The role she gives herself is narrower than reviewer, and it describes what she actually does: she reads an operator’s legal documents as editions, each carrying a date, and sets one edition against another.

The subject of this site made that method compulsory rather than optional. Its live legal pages stayed shut to the machine this site is checked on, so both editions quoted here are archived captures of the operator’s own text: 902,657 characters from 9 August 2026, and 444,165 from 24 April 2025. Two dated copies of one contract, and a difference between them that can be counted.

Aneta holds zero accounts with any operator named on this site. The deposits, payouts and closures described anywhere here belong to other people and reach these pages as published text.

What gets opened

Five kinds of document count as a source, and the list ends there.

An operator’s terms, in whatever the operator calls them, are the first and the heaviest. Refund and privacy policies come second, because they carry the handling rules that the terms summarise. Responsible-gambling wording is third, read as a clause rather than as a promise. Fourth is the help-centre answer, which is used sparingly and labelled every time, since an answer can be rewritten without amending a contract. Fifth is the entry in a public licence register, where one exists and opens.

Everything outside those five sits outside the evidence. A comparison table on another site, a forum thread, a press release repeated by twenty outlets, and an operator’s own marketing copy wherever it disagrees with the operator’s own contract.

Each figure travels with three things attached: the clause it was copied from, the name of the document, and the date of the copy that was read. For archived text the capture date leads and the reading date follows separately, because a September reading of an August file describes August. The full account of that, with five weak points named, is on the method behind these dates.

Four things this site declines to do

It states nothing about this operator’s permit, in either direction. Anything numeric about a licence sits behind template placeholders in both copies held here; the 2026 capture carries a Curaçao answer and an Anjouan answer side by side while the terms in the same file run under Costa Rican law; and the Curaçao register was opened on 2 September 2026 and left unqueried. Three jurisdictions and zero resolving documents support a finding in one direction as poorly as they support one in the other. So the cell stays empty and the contradiction gets printed.

It prints no figure without its clause and its date. A number quoted alone claims to describe the edition in force today, which is a claim nobody here can make. Where a document was unread, the cell stays empty rather than borrowed. An empty cell is never a zero and never a permission.

It describes zero experience. The phrases we tested, we withdrew and our team played appear nowhere on this site. They would describe something somebody did, and everything here describes something somebody read. Those are different kinds of claim, and only one of them is supported.

It stays silent on routes around a territorial rule, and on the law where you live. A restricted-territory clause settles who an operator declines to serve, according to the operator. What a statute permits is a separate question with separate sources and belongs to a lawyer. The clause itself is quoted whole on the restricted countries page, and the quotation is where this site stops.

Corrections

Terms are edited without notice. Registers are updated. Where a figure here disagrees with what an operator prints today, the operator is right and this page is stale.

Every date on these pages marks when a copy was captured or opened, rather than a promise about the document as it stands now. The further those dates recede, the more it is worth opening the operator’s own page before depositing.

Questions people actually type

Why is the site called Thirteen Added?
Because that is the finding it was built around. An archived capture of the operator’s own text dated 24 April 2025 lists 24 restricted territories; a capture of the same text dated 9 August 2026 lists 37. Thirteen names joined the list across those fifteen months and zero names left it. A contract that grows in one direction while a reader’s account stays open is a different object from a contract read once at sign-up, and the name keeps that in view.
Does the author hold accounts with the operators covered?
Aneta holds zero accounts with any operator named here, places zero bets and makes zero withdrawals. Every sentence on this site describes a document that was opened on a stated date. Where a figure would need an account screen to read — per-coin minimums, confirmation counts, in-house bet ceilings — the field stays empty and says so in words.
How is this site paid for?
One row in the comparison table is an advertising arrangement and carries the label paid placement wherever it appears. Links to it are marked as sponsored and run through a path excluded from this site’s sitemap. Zero other operators here are linked at all: their addresses appear as plain text, because a link is an invitation and these are facts about companies.