Nine coins, one network rule, and the condition on every deposit
What the cashier section commits to in writing
The operator’s own pages name nine crypto coins and no fiat currencies. Clause 4.1 requires the full value of every deposit to be wagered once before a withdrawal can be requested, promotion or no promotion. The per-coin minimums exist in the published text only as templates with the figures stripped out.
Nine coins, and where that list comes from
Nine crypto coins are named on the operator’s own pages: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether, USD Coin, Litecoin, Dogecoin, Ripple, TRON and Solana. The sentence carrying them reads “we support nine crypto coins, including” and then names all nine, so the word doing the hedging is doing no work at all.
That list is marketing copy rather than a numbered term, and it is recorded anyway, for a reason worth stating: the same nine coins appear in eight separate strings across the operator’s published text. A claim repeated eight times in a company’s own materials is a different order of evidence from a claim on a comparison site, even though it is still weaker than a clause.
The network rule that costs people money
One line in the help-centre material deserves more prominence than it gets. For Ethereum and Tether transactions, only the ERC-20 network is accepted; smart contracts and BSC are not.
Set that beside a sentence from the deposit terms: deposits made using unsupported networks, or below the minimum threshold, may be considered lost and non-recoverable.
Together those two sentences describe a real and permanent way to lose a deposit, published by the operator itself. Tether in particular travels over several networks, and picking the cheap one out of habit is exactly the mistake the second sentence declines to remedy. Neither line is hidden, and neither is prominent.
The condition on every deposit
Clause 4.1 is the most consequential sentence in the whole cashier section, and it is not a bonus term.
The full value of a deposit must be wagered at least once before a withdrawal is requested. The clause states this applies to all deposits, including sports bets, and not merely to those tied to a promotion, and that a request made without the deposit having been wagered in full may be delayed or denied until it has been.
A wagering requirement on plain money, not on bonus funds.
Read literally, that means money paid in and left alone cannot simply be taken out again: it has to pass through a game first. Deposit terms of that kind are usually framed as anti-abuse measures, and the clause does not explain itself. The figure — one times the deposit — is the only hard multiple published anywhere in the general terms, which is a point worth holding on to, because the bonus section publishes none at all. Clause 6 says each promotion carries its own wagering requirement, time limit, game restriction and minimum deposit, disclosed with the offer. Those individual pages were not read, so no bonus multiple appears anywhere on this site.
| Casino | Operator | Licence | Countries barred | Withdrawal limit | Visit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vavepaid placement | TechOptions Group B.V. | Curaçao no number | list not read | from 50,000 USDT in instalments cl. 8.8 | Visit |
| Gamdom | not published | not published | 37 | not published | |
| Rocketpot | Danneskjold Ventures B.V. | Curacao | 34 | not published | |
| Bitcasino.io | Moon Technologies B.V. | Curaçao Gaming Authority | 1 | not published | |
| Wild.io | Stack Gaming Ltd. | Curaçao Gaming Authority | 45 | not published | |
| Wild Fortune | Metlait SRL | Anjouan Gaming Board | 47 | not published | |
| Instant Casino | Igloo Ventures SRL | Curaçao Gaming Authority | 48 | not published | |
| CoinCasino | Igloo Ventures SRL | Anjouan Gaming Board | 36 | not published | |
| Bets.io | Techno Wave Systems S.R.L. | Curaçao Gaming Authority | 42 | not published | |
| Playbet.io | Bitx Operations N.V. | Curaçao Gaming Authority | 30 | not published | |
| CryptoLeo | Uno Digital Media B.V. | Curaçao Gaming Authority | 74 | not published | |
| BetPlays | not published | not published | 15 | not published |
The figures that are not published
Four separate cashier numbers a reader would want are absent from the operator’s published text, and the absences have a common shape.
- The per-coin minimum deposit exists only as a template with the number stripped out.
- The minimum and maximum withdrawal per transaction are, by clause 5.2, displayed inside the account.
- No processing time appears anywhere, only clause 5.3’s “typically fast”.
- No fee amount or percentage is given for deposits or withdrawals, although both are said to be possible and set by third parties.
Every one of those figures lives behind a logged-in session. From where this site is written the operator’s pages could not be opened at all, so none of them was read, and none is guessed at. An empty cell here means the document was not read, as the reading rules set out in full.
What the withdrawal section does say
Clause 5 declines to set a fixed maximum monthly withdrawal and, in the same paragraph, reserves the right to process large withdrawals in structured instalments for operational, security or compliance reasons, with the schedule communicated at the time. No threshold triggers that right. It is a discretion rather than a limit, and it cannot be planned around.
Four conditions must be met before any withdrawal proceeds: deposited funds cleared and not subject to chargebacks or reversals, required identity checks completed, no ongoing investigation that would reasonably justify a delay, and no suspicion of bonus abuse or other breach. The identity condition carries its own warning that delays in providing documents pause processing until verification is finished — and no amount is published at which those documents become compulsory. The whole payout section is taken apart clause by clause on the withdrawal rules page.
Both deposits and withdrawals must be in the account holder’s own name, with no third-party accounts, cards or wallets on either side. The withdrawal version of that rule contains the operator’s own typo — “all deposits must originate from a personal Account, e-wallet, or card in our name” — quoted here as printed rather than tidied, because a contract is evidence of the care taken with it.
One document that has not kept up
The Refund Policy carries the date 1 October 2025 and allows a refund request within twenty-four hours of a deposit, or within thirty days where sworn statements establish that someone else, or a minor, used the account. Those windows stand word for word in both archived copies we hold, so they are current as far as the later capture goes.
The same current document still describes trading Steam skins, commission taken in skins, and withdrawals to QIWI, WebMoney and Yandex Money wallets. It is not an old copy: that is the operator’s own text as published. What that says about the accuracy of the rest of the cashier language is left to the reader, alongside the twelve rows on the front page.